Those guests continue to be loyal and our revenues are consistent,” Garces said.
“Our business issues are not having, and will not have, any impact on the level of service we provide to our customers.
The suit says Garces signed a note in September promising to pay the firm back, but never made a payment.
Home Chef has been on the market for half a decade and in that time, it has developed into a perfect example of what a meal kit delivery service should look like.
His reporting has examined police mistreatment of rape victims, corruption among Pennsylvania public officials, the high dismissal rate in the Philadelphia criminal courts, among other issues. A dozen years ago, a then-unknown chef named Jose Garces won financial backing from a New Jersey couple and a major Philadelphia food vendor to open Amada, the place on Chestnut Street that launched a meteoric career.
In the years that followed, Garces has gone on to open a dizzying array of acclaimed restaurants across Philadelphia and its suburbs, in Manhattan, Chicago, Washington, Palm Springs, Scottsdale, and Atlantic City.
Entdecke den einzigartigen Sprachschatz von Linguee. Fremdsprachen zu sprechen und zu schreiben wird leichter denn je, dank Millionen von zuverlssigen bersetzungen. Auf Linguee kannst du dich verlassen, ob mit oder ohne Internetverbindung.
The suit is part of a rash of litigation brought against Garces since last fall, charging him with shorting food suppliers on their bills, a Center City landlord for rent, and investors for unfulfilled promises of cash to be generated by his restaurants.Linguee ist intuitiv und schnell: Du siehst bersetzungen, noch bevor du ein Wort ausgeschrieben hast.Hast du dich jemals gefragt, ob eine bestimmte Phrase schon einmal bersetzt wurde?The harshest suit against him was filed in January by Tom and Maria Spinner, a couple from the Trenton suburbs who joined Sorkin as early investors in Amada.Even before their investment, their son, Tim, worked side by side with the chef and was mentored by him before the younger man opened his own eatery.
His “wrongful actions,” they claim, amount to “a massive, self-interested and continuing fraud -– in substance and operation a Ponzi scheme – at the expense of his investors.” Garces declined to grant an interview for this story. Del Bello Jr., his lawyer in the Spinner case, dismissed the lawsuit as an action of a “disgruntled investor who is unhappy with the performance of certain investments, which happens in the restaurant industry.” “They participated in some winning and some losing restaurants,” Del Bello said.